Rudraputra wrote:-1)"Rudramala ke baad hoti hai vishnumala....yah rudramala phir vishnumala mein pironi hai yani Vishnu ke rajya mein jaate hai"--------Mu 22.2.97
"After rudra beads there is beads of Vishnu...this rudra beads than are added to Vishnu beads that is going to Vishnu's rule(or empire)"
2)
"Vijaymala ke manke ban na badi baat nahi hai;lekin baap ke simarne ke manke banna yahi khushnaseebi hai." --------A.V 20.5.74
"It is not a big thing to become bead of Vijaymala but to be a bead of remembrance of Father is the happiest thing"
3)
"Vishnu ki mala pravrutti marg ki hai"--------Mu 18.11.02
"Garland of Vishnu is of the couples(Lakshmi Narayan)"
4)
"Jodiyon ki mala hai.Single ki mala nahi hoti."--------Mu 8.9.68
"Garland is of couples.There is no garland of singles"
5)....here Baba had said lot of things....
Rudramala is mala of ShivBaba that is Father(garland of the souls who will become Narayan) while Vishnumala or vijaymala is mala of the souls generally represented to the couples that is Lakshmi-Narayan but from 1) Murli point it is clearly understood that Rudramala gets added to vijaymala and then they form couple....so
Rudramala=group of Narayan.....R
Vijaymala=group of Lakshmi.....V
R+V=V....
...both are incomplete without each other and together they make each other complete....
1). this rudra beads than are added to Vishnu beads :- I think the translation is not correct here. Bead does not mean mala. In a mala, there will be number of beads.The Murli point says- Rudramala gets into(becomes) Vishnumala. It does not say beads of rudramala get added to beads of Vishnumala.
2)By the above Murli point PBKs come to the conclusion that the souls of Rudramala and Vishnumala are not same.
But I feel the above Murli point just implies- braahmins are greater than deities. It does not imply that souls of braahmins and deities are different. [But Baba makes children to realize their present status].
In Sakar Murli Baba says- braahmins are greater than deities. Even in Avyakt Murlis Baba says- your present swamaan and power is much higher than what you are in Golden Age. But we all know that braahmins souls only become deities.
There are Murli points which say-both Vishnumala and Rudramala are one and the same. I will mention within a week.
3)Dear pbk souls, what about Rudramala? Is it also mala of pravruttimarg?
4)So- is rudramala is of pravruttimarg= jodis(couples)? If yes, how? If not, how can it be called as mala? (Since the Murli point says- Garland is of couples.There is no garland of singles).
If rudramala is of couples, then how come those beads get added into beads of Vishnumala? How can couples get added into beads of another mala?
5)I feel you are contradicting your own statements here as explained above.
Hence I feel souls of both Rudramala and Vishnumala are same. But the status of Rudramala is higher than that of Vishnumala.