The point was not about copyright here. Have you read the following properly?The entire knowledge that BKWSU preaches has been given by ShivBaba and not any BK. So, BKWSU cannot claim copyright. Now, the Same ShivBaba is clarifying the BK Murlis and Avyakt Vanis and giving new knowledge to the PBKs. Same is the case with the pictures
My response in this thread was- I had said in the beginning- "no real Gita (just words of Shiv)"Abhimanyu wrote:Well ShivBaba(Shiv through Veerendra Dev Dixit) in many Murli CDs have spoken advance Murlis without referring to the basic Murli(spoken through Dada Lekhraj). Sometimes even for full 1 hour in pure continuous flow.
Also there are many discussion CDs available where Baba has responded to every query(asked by students) directly without referring any material.
Now- of the following- which one do PBKs believe as true Gita and false Gita-
# those have come through DL
# the one's that have come through mouth of Dadi Gulzar
# words that have come through mouth of Mr. Dixit after reading the Murlis and Vanis,
# the one that comes from mouth of Dixit as continuous flow without referring anything
# The one that is part of Q and A with children/PBKs.
But, as regarding the copyright- as you have mentioned-
The dependency of PBKs on Murlis and pictures of BKWSU openly explains their level of teaching. Without that they have no existence. BKWSU is not at all dependent on lowkik Gita in its Godly service activities. It seems that PBKs are more dependent on BKWSU and the Murlis available there than BKs. A great point to be noted by those who claim they have real Gita.
Even today- their God of Gita gives clarification on Avyakt Murlis spoken at BKWSU, Now, do they believe it is Gita (I do not think so). Then why do they give clarification? God only knows.