False accusations. i have never denied.arjun wrote:Om Shanti. Members must have read the irrational arguements put forward by mbbhat Bhai to deny Old Sakar Murlis to the interested souls.
He says that it is better to read the revised SMs circulated by BKWSU through email.
Once again 100% wrong accusation. I have never said so. i said that most BKs who had requested for Murlis desire so.
Then what PBKs are doing so far with god personally with them? what a pitiable state of PBKs! is it not?What the use when a large chunk of the original unrevised Murli has been deleted or changed by BKWSU. It is like eating adulterated food.
Does arjun soul has tried to know how many old Murlis in total AIVV has? Did he ever tried in getting them- either soft copy or hard copy? Why could not he scan all of them and post in the forum?
-------
Being in AIVV, wthout doing that job, he is accusing someone, to get scan or type and post it in the forum free of cost!*
-----
And he is not ready to accept the failure of not able to identify the typing errors done by BKWSU by their Chariot. And a great cause for mis interpretation of Murli points.
Has Arjun soul at least brought the typing errors into the notice of their Chariot?
-------
* and what is the aim? If PBKs have older versions, then they cannot be caught like black and white as had been caught now. so- they can continue their mis interpretation with lesser obstacles.
There is some honesty in FB soul - because that soul has some impartiality in such things, but still limited extent in terms of human value/rights towards those BKs.
But, the PBKs have just their aim . I am not opposing that. They can have. But then, they should not accuse others in such a way and cannot have expectations. This shows once again their double standards.